• Home
  • About
    • Leadership
  • Directory
  • News
  • Events
    • Event Calendar
    • Event List
  • Membership
    • Join >
      • Benefits
    • Member Sign-In
    • Manage Account
  • Advocacy
    • ​Judicial Advocacy
    • Legislative Advocacy
  • Contact Us
ASAC
     (614) 570-4758

New California Laws for 2023

12/19/2022

0 Comments

 
The California Legislature introduced more than 4476 bills in 2021-2022 sessions, with 1726 coming in the second session, down from the 2750 in the first session.
​
This article summarizes some of the more important bills affecting contractors in their roles as contractors, addressing issues such as payroll liability and reporting, construction delivery and contracts, licensing, design-build, best value, and dispute resolution.1 These new laws are effective January 1, 2023, unless otherwise noted. Not addressed here are many other bills that will affect contractors in their roles as businesses, taxpayers, and employers. Each of the summaries is brief, focusing on what is most important to contractors. Because not all aspects of these bills are discussed, each summary’s title is a live link to the full text of the referenced bills for those wanting to explore the details of the new laws.

READ MORE

ASAC Legislative Victories

Retention Reform-Public Works – AB 2173 (2022) Effective 1/1/23 secures 5% retention perpetually. ASAC has been in the forefront and heavily supported 5% retention bills. Previous bills included AB 92 (2017) Effective 1/1/18: Extended SB 293 (2011) through 1/1/2023. The huge victory was won in 2011 when SB 293 was signed by Governor Brown capping retention at 5% (for non-substantially complex projects-see AB 1705). 

Win in critical “Pay When Paid” California Case (April 2020): The American Subcontractors Association made a significant win for subcontractors in Crosno Construction, Inc. et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety of America. In 2019 ASA/ASAC produced a friend-of-the-court brief affirming a California Superior Court’s judgment regarding “pay when paid” provisions used to withhold payment from a subcontractor. On April 17, 2020, the California Court of Appeals ruled in favor of subcontractors to limit enforcement of “pay-when-paid” clauses that delay those payments to subcontractors.

Public Contracts Payment - AB 1223 (2017) Effective 1/1/18: Requires within 10 days of making a construction contract payment, a state agency that maintains an Internet Web site to post on its Internet Web site the project for which the payment was made, the name of the construction contractor or company paid, the date the payment was made or the date the state agency transmitted instructions to the Controller or other payer to make the payment, the payment application number or other identifying information, and the amount of the payment. Exempt from these provisions are construction contracts valued below $25,000 and specified progress payments published in the California State Contracts Register under existing law. 

Public Contracts Payment - AB 1705 (2013)
Effective 1/1/15: In 2014 ASAC successfully sponsored this bill which closed a loophole in SB 293 (2011, effective 1/1/12), to define/delete what public project is “substantially complex.” Without a clear definition any project could be deemed “substantially complex” and the 5% cap on retention could be exceeded. The bill requires agencies to explain why they determined a project to be substantially complex and to disclose that to bidders along with the increase in retention if applicable. The bill also extended the “sunset” to Jan.1, 2018. Governor Brown signed the bill, which became effective January 1, 2015. NECA cosponsored this legislation. 

Payment Protection - AB 164 (2013) Effective 1/1/14: Governor Jerry Brown signed this ASAC bill requiring the developer to provide payment and performance bonds, in a manner similar to the Little Miller Act, on Public/Private Partnerships (3Ps) in California. 3Ps, is an emerging trend whereby the public provides lands that are being developed by private companies that have no legal obligation to pay contractors. The contractors have no lien rights because the land is publically owned, there is no public money to go after with a Stop Notice, and payment and performance bonds WERE not required to be in place. Much of the money for these 3Pprojects comes from outside the United States. The developers are forming LLCs and other protected entities. If the project goes bad or gets canceled, the developer can bankrupt the LLC and move on without paying anybody -- there was no recourse for the contractors. Beginning 1/1/2014, payment and performance bonds must be in place, providing payment remedies for subcontractors and suppliers, and ensuring that the project will be completed for the public entity. 

Indemnification Reform - SB 474 (2012) Effective 1/1/13: ASAC has always supported the idea that the person indemnifying has no obligation to defend actions or proceedings prior to a preliminary or final determination of liability. Neither should that person be liable in any amount that exceeds the finally determined percentage of liability, based upon comparative fault. In 2012 Governor Brown signed SB 474, which establishes a proportionate, or comparative, liability standard that holds each party responsible only for the damage it causes and defense costs for that damage. The new law improves California’s statute, which, when other parties are not solely at fault in the past allowed subs to be held responsible for 100% of the injuries, damage, and defense costs arising from other parties’ mistakes. The new law applies to public and private construction contracts entered into on or after Jan.1, 2013. One of the principal supporters of this bill was ASAC. Bottom line is if a claim has nothing to do with your work you will not have to pay for someone else’s mistakes.

Payment Protection - Amicus Brief in Eggers Industries v. Flintco, Inc. (2012): 2nd tier supplier is “subcontractor” when providing manufactured items pursuant to specifications entitled to lien, payment bond and stop payment notice rights. ASA submitted Amicus Brief in support of contractors in this case and it resulted in a published opinion supporting contractors. 

Retention Reform-Public Works - SB 293 (2011) Effective 1/1/12: Retention reform has always been an important issue for ASAC. There is no quick solution to this problem that has developed over the years, but ASAC persists in chipping away at it as the occasion arises. A huge victory was won in 2011 when SB 293 was signed by Governor Brown, effective 1/1/12 capping retention at 5% (for non-substantially complex projects-see AB 1705 above).

AB 92 (2017) Effective 1/1/18: Extended through 1/1/2013. SB 293 caps retainage from the owner to the prime contractor at 5% on state and local public contracts entered into between Jan. 1, 2012 and Jan. 1, 2016. State law already prohibits a prime contractor from retaining more from a sub than the owner retains from the prime. The new statute also improves the state’s prompt payment law by requiring upper-tier contractors on public projects to pay lower-tier contractors within 7 days of receiving a progress payment. Previously, upper-tier contractors had 10 days to pay. This bill was supported by ASAC, AGC and many construction trade organizations. While ASAC didn’t sponsor this bill, we did get language added that helps preserve subcontractors’ late bond claim rights. 

Mechanics Lien Law – SB 189 (2010) Effective 7/1/12: In 2011 ASAC monitored the California Law Revision Commission (CLRC) as they reviewed and proposed revisions to the state Mechanics Lien Law. The resulting changes were presented to the legislature in SB 189 (Lowenthal), with additional changes presented in SB 190. SB 189 was a complete overhaul of all Mechanic Lien statutes. A massive 244 pages long, it recodified code sections, made substantive changes in law, and might have inadvertently overruled or called into question recent court rulings that are beneficial to sub-trades. A group of construction associations, ASAC included, determined that the measure needed thorough analysis in order to accept, support or oppose the proposed revision to the codes. A team of eminently qualified attorneys agreed to represent the sub-trades and trade associations and take on this task. This team delivered to the CLRC a 25-page executive summary (supported by over 100 pages of detailed analysis) setting forth trades’ concerns and recommendations about the draft bill. These concerns were accepted by the CLRC and the bill was amended accordingly. Obviously, ML's protect our businesses. We must defend our members in this issue. ASAC helped organize the “SB 189 – Trade Contractor Legal Analysis Group”, recruited other associations to the cause, and helped fund the work done by the attorneys. SB 189, was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger in September 2010 and became law with a much needed implementation delay to July of 2012. That date gives the organizations time to educate members so they can comply with the ML law from the start. 

Owner Implied Warranty - Amicus Brief in Great American v. LAUSD (2010): Owners implied warranty of plans. ASA submitted Amicus Brief in support of contractors in this case and it resulted in a published opinion supporting contractors. 

Insurance - Amicus Brief in Vandenberg v. Superior Court (1999): Insurance obligation in CGL insurance policy, may provide an insured coverage for losses pleaded as contractual damages (as opposed to only if plead as negligence claim). ASA submitted Amicus Brief in support of contractors in this case and it resulted in a published opinion supporting contractors. 

Payment Protection (1997): In 1997 ASA formed SLDF and wins first case – eliminating pay-if-paid clauses in California. The California Supreme Court Declares A Pay If Paid Clauses Are Void: The leading opinion on pay if paid clauses in California contracts was issued by the Supreme Court of California in 1997 for the case Wm. R. Clarke Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Company (15 Cal.4th 882)

READ MORE
0 Comments

ASAC MEMBER NOTICE:   This is Governor Newsom's EXECUTIVE ORDER.  It has some vague terms and construction is not explicitly defined and is left up to localities.

3/23/2020

0 Comments

 
SACRAMENTO - Governor Gavin Newsom issued a stay at home order to protect the health and well-being of all Californians and to establish consistency across the state in order to slow the spread of COVID-19.

EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXECUTIVE ORDER N-33-20

WHEREAS on March 4, 2020, I proclaimed a State of Emergency to exist in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19; and

WHEREAS in a short period of time, COVID-19 has rapidly spread throughout California, necessitating updated and more stringent guidance from federal, state, and local public health officials; and

WHEREAS for the preservation of public health and safety throughout the entire State of California, I find it necessary for all Californians to heed the State public health directives from the Department of Public Health.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, in accordance with the authority vested in me by the State Constitution and statutes of the State of California, and in particular, Government Code sections 8567, 8627, and 8665 do hereby issue the following Order to become effective immediately:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1) To preserve the public health and safety, and to ensure the healthcare delivery system is capable of serving all, and prioritizing those at the highest risk and vulnerability, all residents are directed to immediately heed the current State public health directives, which I ordered the Department of Public Health to develop for the current statewide status of COVID-19. Those directives are consistent with the March 19, 2020, Memorandum on Identification of Essential Critical Infrastructure Workers During COVID-19 Response, found at: https://covid19.ca.gov/. 

Those directives follow:

ORDER OF THE STATE PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER   March 19, 2020
To protect public health, I as State Public Health Officer and Director of the California Department of Public Health order all individuals living in the State of California to stay home or at their place of residence except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of the federal critical infrastructure sectors, as outlined at https://www.cisa.gov/identifying-critical-infrastructure-during-covid-19. In addition, and in consultation with the Director of the Governor's Office of Emergency Services, I may designate additional sectors as critical in order to protect the health and well-being of all Californians.

Pursuant to the authority under the Health and Safety Code 120125, 120140, 131080, 120130(c), 120135, 120145, 120175 and 120150, this order is to go into effect immediately and shall stay in effect until further notice.

The federal government has identified 16 critical infrastructure sectors whose assets, systems, and networks, whether physical or virtual, are considered so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect on security, economic security, public health or safety, or any combination thereof. I order that Californians working in these 16 critical infrastructure sectors may continue their work because of the importance of these sectors to Californians' health and well-being.

This Order is being issued to protect the public health of Californians. The California Department of Public Health looks to establish consistency across the state in order to ensure that we mitigate the impact of COVID-19. Our goal is simple, we want to bend the curve, and disrupt the spread of the virus.

The supply chain must continue, and Californians must have access to such necessities as food, prescriptions, and health care. When people need to leave their homes or places of residence, whether to obtain or perform the functions above, or to otherwise facilitate authorized necessary activities, they should at all times practice social distancing.

2)  The health care delivery system shall prioritize services to serving those who are the sickest and shall prioritize resources, including personal protective equipment, for the providers providing direct care to them.

3)  The Office of Emergency Services is directed to take necessary steps to ensure compliance with this Order.

4)  This Order shall be enforceable pursuant to California law, including, but not limited to, Government Code section 8665.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as soon as hereafter possible, this Order be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State and that widespread publicity and notice be given of this Order.

This Order is not intended to, and does not, create any rights or benefits, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, against the State of California, its agencies, departments, entities, officers, employees, or any other person.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand.

 
ATTEST:
ALEX PADILLA Secretary of State

0 Comments

Membership Renewal

8/28/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT


​
​ASAC Partners,
 
I want to take this opportunity to again thank all our members for their ongoing support. With your help, we had great success sponsoring Assembly Bill 1223 (Caballero, D) which requires state government entities to timely post online when payments are made to GC's on construction projects and how much they were paid. This will help subcontractors determine (online) when their GC was paid, in what amount, and therefore enable them to lawfully demand immediate payment.
 
Last year we sponsored Senate Bill 1077 (Wilk, R) simply required non-residential and public construction project owners to timely provide to potential bidders the complete terms of their "wrap" insurance policy with the bid solicitation package, so bidders know whether to bid on the project, and at what amount.  ASAC valiantly withstood the onslaught of opposition and with support from labor, NECA, UCON, the Union Roofers Association, and a GC organization the bill was in the home stretch. Despite numerous amendments and after garnering support from some major GC's and both Labor and Open Shop organizations, the CBIA reversed course over the weekend before session ended and sent in an opposition letter claiming the bill negatively impacted affordable housing starts. While we question the relevance it compelled the author to drop the measure to the severe disappointment of ASAC, URCA, and others.   
 
This year ASAC shifted its focus on Assembly Bill 1736.  It is aimed at providing all contractors prompt notification of who the low bidder is on projects owned by local agencies (not State agencies or Universities). The Bill sits now with the Senate Governance & Finance Committee.  We continue to ask members to send their support in writing to their senator while ASAC continues to persevere.
 
Accordingly, your personal contribution to our efforts will pave the way toward success in the new Legislature beginning in January.  If you'd like to contribute by being a member of our Governmental Relations Committee (and help determine positions on several pending bills), or if you're ready to step up and volunteer to lead ASAC please contact me!
 
Forward!

Brett Eckles
President


0 Comments

ASA National News - Legislative Fly In

7/31/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
JUST A FINAL REMINDER - ASA 2019 Legislative Fly In Registration Ends This Wednesday, July 31st.  No registrations will be accepted after July 31st!  Thank you for your cooperation.
Back by popular demand, we are pleased to invite you to ASA's Legislative Fly In to Washington, D.C. on Tuesday-Wednesday, October 29 -30, 2019.   This will be an awesome opportunity to advocate on behalf of ASA members and their legislative priorities with members of Congress and congressional staff. 
On Tuesday, October 29th, we will plan to have a legislative, lobbying preparation session in the afternoon followed by a welcoming dinner.  On Wednesday, October 30th, we will walk the halls of Congress starting at 9:30 A.M. until roughly 5:00 P.M. so set your Fitbit's accordingly, you will definitely get plenty of steps in that day! 
We look forward to seeing you in October, and much more to follow after your registration is complete. 
Fly-In program Includes:
  • Meeting on The Hill with your Members of Congress or their staff
  • A briefing session on ASA's legislative priorities in Congress and training on lobbying and influencing your elected officials
  • Networking with your ASA peers from across the country
Registration: $125 per person
Registration is now open through July 31, 2019. Fees include briefing sessions, breakfast, group reception and dinner. Hotel information will be provided to Fly In registrants following the July 31st deadline.

Lodging:
We will be confirming hotel and booking information following the July 31st registration deadline. Rates for Washington, DC at this time of year are expected to be between $300 - $400 per night.   

Schedule-at-a-Glance:
Tuesday, October 29, 2019
TBD Afternoon Group Activity
3:30pm - 5:30m Mandatory Briefing Session on ASA Legislative Priorities & Fly-In Protocol
7:00pm Networking Cocktail Reception & Dinner
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
7:00am - 8:30am Breakfast
9:30am - 5:00pm        Meetings on Capitol Hill

For more information or to register: https://members.asaonline.com/ap/Events/Register/9pQYonbp?sourceTypeId=EmailInvitation

ASA  Webinar


Trade Strategies - Attracting and Building a Workforce for the Future
Tuesday, August 13, 2019
In this webinar hear what is going on in the Phoenix market to address the number one challenge the trades face - lack of a workforce. Mike Brewer, CEO of the Brewer Companies, Arizona's largest residential plumbing contractor will share how the industry,
Register for Event Learn More
​
0 Comments

2017 ASAC Accomplishments

2/14/2018

0 Comments

 

ASAC WINS VICTORIES
FOR SUBCONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS!

 
WITHOUT THE PROTECTIONS AFFORDED BY THE STATUTES & CASES IN WHICH ASA ARE INVOLVED, SUBCONTRACTORS’ RIGHTS WOULD BE ABROGATED!

  • Public Contracts Payment - AB 1223 (2017)  
Effective 1/1/18 
Requires within 10 days of making a construction contract payment, a state agency that maintains an Internet Web shall post on its Internet Web site the project for which the payment was made, the name of the construction contractor or company paid, the date the payment was made or the date the state agency transmitted instructions to the Controller or other payer to make the payment, the payment application number or other identifying information, and the amount of the payment. Exempt from these provisions are construction contracts valued below $25,000 and progress payments published in the California State Contracts Register under existing law.

  • Retention Reform-Public Works – AB 92 (2017)
Effective 1/1/18
Extends SB 293 (2011) through 1/1/2023  A huge victory was won in 2011 when SB 293 was signed by Governor Brown capping retention at 5% (for non-substantially complex projects-see AB 1705).
 
HISTORICAL VICTORIES:
                                                             
  • Public Contracts Payment - AB 1705 (2013) Effective 1/1/15: In 2014 ASAC successfully sponsored this bill which closed a loophole in SB 293 (2011, effective 1/1/12), to define/delete what public project is “substantially complex.” Without a clear definition any project could be deemed “substantially complex” and the 5% cap on retention could be exceeded.  As amended, the bill requires agencies to explain why they determined a project to be substantially complex and to disclose that to bidders along with the increase in retention if applicable.  The bill also extended the “sunset” to Jan.1, 2018.  Governor Brown signed the bill, which became effective January 1, 2015.  NECA co-sponsored this legislation.
 
  • Payment Protection - AB 164 (2013) Effective 1/1/14:  Governor Jerry Brown signed this ASAC bill requiring the developer to provide payment and performance bonds, in a manner similar to the Little Miller Act, on Public/Private Partnerships (3Ps) in California.
 
3Ps, is an emerging trend whereby the public provides lands that are being developed by private companies that have no legal obligation to pay contractors.  The contractors have no lien rights because the land is publicly owned, there is no public money to go after with a Stop Notice, and payment and performance bonds were not required to be in place.
 
Much of the money for these 3Pprojects comes from outside the United States.  The developers are forming LLCs and other protected entities.   If the project goes bad or gets canceled, the developer can bankrupt the LLC and move on without paying anybody -- there was no recourse for the contractors.
 
Beginning 1/1/2014, payment and performance bonds must be in place, providing payment remedies for subcontractors and suppliers, and ensuring that the project will be completed for the public entity.

  • Indemnification Reform - SB 474 (2012) Effective 1/1/13:  ASAC has always supported the idea that the person indemnifying has no obligation to defend actions or proceedings prior to a preliminary or final determination of liability.  Neither should that person be liable in any amount that exceeds the finally determined percentage of liability, based upon comparative fault.
 
In 2012 Governor Brown signed SB 474, which establishes a proportionate, or comparative, liability standard that holds each party responsible only for the damage it causes and defense costs for that damage.  The new law improves California’s statute, which, when other parties are not solely at fault in the past allowed subs to be held responsible for 100% of the injuries, damage, and defense costs arising from other parties’ mistakes.  The new law applies to public and private construction contracts entered into on or after Jan.1, 2013.  One of the principal supporters of this bill was ASAC.  Bottom line is if a claim has nothing to do with your work you will not have to pay for someone else’s mistakes.

  • Retention Reform-Public Works - SB 293 (2011) Effective 1/1/12: Retention reform as always been an important issue for ASAC.  There is no quick solution to this problem that has developed over the years, but ASAC persists in chipping away at it as the occasion arises.  A huge victory was won in 2011 when SB 293 was signed by Governor Brown, effective 1/1/12 capping retention at 5% (for non-substantially complex projects-see AB 1705 above). AB 92 (2017) Effective 1/1/18: Extended through 1/1/213.
 
SB 293 caps retainage from the owner to the prime contractor at 5% on state and local public contracts entered into between Jan. 1, 2012 and Jan. 1, 2016.  State law already prohibits a prime contractor from retaining more from a sub than the owner retains from the prime.  The new statute also improves the state’s prompt payment law by requiring upper-tier contractors on public projects to pay lower-tier contractors within 7 days of receiving a progress payment.  Previously, upper-tier contractors had 10 days to pay.  This bill was supported by ASAC, AGC and many construction trade organizations.  While ASAC didn’t sponsor this bill, we did get language added that helps preserve subcontractors’ late bond claim rights.
 
§ Mechanics Lien Law – SB 189 (2010) Effective 7/1/12: In 2011 ASAC monitored the California Law Revision Commission (CLRC) as they reviewed and proposed revisions to the state Mechanics Lien Law. The resulting changes were presented to the legislature in SB 189 (Lowenthal), with additional changes presented in SB 190.
 
SB 189 was a complete overhaul of all Mechanic Lien statutes.  A massive 244 pages long, it recodified code sections, made substantive changes in law, and might have inadvertently overruled or called into question recent court rulings that are beneficial to sub-trades.
 
A group of construction associations, ASAC included, determined that the measure needed thorough analysis in order to accept, support or oppose the proposed revision to the codes.  A team of eminently qualified attorneys agreed to represent the sub-trades and trade associations and take on this task. This team delivered to the CLRC a 25-page executive summary (supported by over 100 pages of detailed analysis) setting forth trades’ concerns and recommendations about the draft bill.  These concerns were accepted by the CLRC and the bill was amended accordingly.
 
Obviously ML's protect our businesses.  We must defend our members in this issue.
 
ASAC helped organize the “SB 189 – Trade Contractor Legal Analysis Group”, recruited other associations to the cause, and helped fund the work done by the attorneys. SB 189, was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger in September 2010 and became law with a much needed implementation delay to July of 2012.  That date gives the organizations time to educate members so they can comply with the ML law from the start.

  • Payment Protection (1997):  In 1997 ASA formed SLDF and wins first case – eliminating pay-if-paid clauses in California. The California Supreme Court Declares A Pay If Paid Clauses Are Void:  The leading opinion on pay if paid clauses in California contracts was issued by the Supreme Court of California in 1997 for the case Wm. R. Clarke Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Company (15 Cal.4th 882).
 
 
Become a member to help ensure your rights as a Subcontractor or Supplier business are not eliminated.  We can’t continue without the support of our subcontractor & supplier industry partners.
 
  
Did you know that without representation at the Capitol in Sacramento, subcontractors and suppliers would be at the mercy of other groups who have lobbyists?
 
ASAC has very competent representation in Skip Daum, our Legislative Advocate. Skip is in Sacramento watching for legislation that you need to Support, Amend, or Oppose that materially affect your business. These issues are brought to the ASAC Government Relations Committee, chaired by Dan McLennon, Esq., for discussion and decisions, and appropriate action is then taken to make sure the laws passed in California are not detrimental to ASAC members.
 
Court actions are reviewed by Scott Holbrook, our Legal Counsel at Crawford and Bangs, LLP.  Scott also counsels ASAC on corporate affairs.  In addition, other member attorneys and members provide input and keep leadership advised of legal happenings.
 
We know you are busy and may not have time to do this, nor do most of us have the expertise. Therefore we trust ASAC to handle this for us, where we can be assured it is being done well.  It is also a great place to learn how to be a part of protecting your business alongside the experts to mentor and guide you.
 
We are working for you even as you go through your daily duties.  Your continued support ensures your business is protected.
 
BUILDING STRONG TRADE CONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS

0 Comments
<<Previous

    Archives

    December 2022
    March 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    February 2018
    November 2016
    May 2016
    January 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Picture
1004 Duke St., Alexandria, VA 22314
Phone: (614) 570-4758
​a
sac.subcontractors@gmail.com ​
Copyright © ASAC - American Subcontractors Association California Inc.
All Rights Reserved. | Links | Privacy Policy |Admin | JDog Enterprises - Websites SEO SEM